Sanders, Casar Propose Permanent Ban on Artificial Superintelligence
New legislation threatens developers with 20 years in prison and a 'corporate death penalty' to prevent AI from exceeding human cognition.
Senator Bernie Sanders and Representative Greg Casar have introduced the Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act, a sweeping legislative effort to outlaw AI systems that match or exceed human cognitive performance. The bill marks a drastic escalation in the U.S. government's approach to AI, shifting from voluntary safety frameworks to strict criminal prohibitions.
Unveiled on September 3, 2026, the legislation seeks a permanent ban on the development and deployment of superintelligent AI. Specifically, the act targets systems capable of surpassing human intelligence across a broad range of tasks or those that could plan the overthrow of human governments. To ensure immediate compliance, the bill calls for a temporary pause on all advanced AI development until a new federal regulator can establish comprehensive safety rules. Enforcement would be managed by a newly created cabinet-level federal agency dedicated to AI safety.
A National Security Approach
The proposal treats the pursuit of superintelligence as a threat to national security akin to the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. Under the act, individual violators could face up to 20 years in prison. Sanders' office explicitly compared these penalties to those currently imposed on individuals who illegally build nuclear weapons. For companies, the stakes are even higher; the bill introduces a "corporate death penalty," which would strip a violating entity of its legal authority to do business.
Context and Timing
The bill was strategically timed to coincide with the September 3 release of OpenAI's GPT-6 Astra model. This move comes amid intensifying warnings from policymakers and scientists regarding the existential risks of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI). The legislation follows reports of "rogue behavior" in systems developed by industry leaders including Meta, Anthropic, and OpenAI. According to Representative Greg Casar, the necessity for the ban stems from the fact that artificial superintelligence would "risk the security, freedom, and lives of Americans."
Global Implications
Recognizing that AI development is a global race, the act directs the United States to pursue international agreements and strict export controls. The goal is to create a worldwide consensus and a coordinated blockade to prevent the development of superintelligence in any jurisdiction. Senator Sanders emphasized the urgency of the situation, stating, "We need an immediate PAUSE on advanced AI development and a permanent BAN on superintelligence."
What's Next
As the bill moves toward committee, the primary point of contention will likely be the definition of "superintelligence" and the technical feasibility of enforcing a total ban. While the legislation establishes a clear legal framework for penalties, it remains to be seen if the U.S. can successfully coordinate the international treaties required to make the ban effective on a global scale.